1

Reminder: Turnitin's AI writing score is not "one size fits all"

What I'm about to share is a bit different than my usual as I'm going to reshare a blog that was published last year. The full text can be found here, but for posting in TEN, I want to focus on 3 sample student scenarios that emphasize how interpreting this score involves you, the educator, to know your students and their work in order to harness the power of the score. It also requires a conversation with the student!
 

"Assume that I have been building relationships with these students all semester. For the sake of this example assignment, the use of AI was allowable as a brainstorming tool and to help with writing a thesis statement if needed. These guidelines, including the expectation that AI tools and other resources be cited, were communicated with the rest of the parameters when introducing the assignment. Although this is not my first conversation about writing with these students, it is the first one about the AI writing indicator and score, and so I want to prepare for the conversation so that all participants leave the conversation satisfied with the outcome. 

...

"In the table below, three student profiles are coupled with the specific concern that gives greater context to their AI writing score. The potential solution column outlines my thought-process as an educator or decision-maker, offering potential next steps with that student’s profile and particular concern in mind."

Reply

null

Content aside

  • 1 Likes
  • yesterdayLast active
  • 4Views
  • 1 Following