AI Detection and Grammarly
Hi everyone, We have faculty using the AI report and are appreciating that feature. An interesting question came up recently: the report showed 64% AI-generated text, but the student claimed he had only used Grammarly, which also helps to improve phrasing. Has anyone else experienced an AI report picking up on Grammarly, and is there a way of distinguishing between a "grammar help" tool and other generative AI?
Second, will the AI report be visible to students soon? Faculty assumed that students could see it, but the report is only visible to faculty in our LMS.
Thanks,
Jennifer Douglas, American Public University System
134 replies
-
Are students required to cite AI if they used Grammarly gen AI and asked it to "improve it"? This is an option on Grammarly now. The result is similar content-wise but often re-written for clarity and such. Will this get flagged on Turnitin or other plagiarism/AI detectors? I'm not sure what qualifies as plagiarism (assuming the student did not cite AI) in terms of using AI as an academic tool. Particularly I want to know if this is acceptable for the International Baccalaureate in writing portions of Arts exams. Is it acceptable if AI is cited for editing/paraphrasing? Is it not acceptable to use AI at all?
Please reply with your thoughts! I realize this is a tricky situation since AI is so new these days and we are all trying to adapt to these recent developments. Thanks!
-
Hello Folks,
Has there been a definitive answer to the question of the AI checker falsely detecting Grammarly? Based on what I have read here, it may depend on the version, but some posts report basic free version being flagged by the AI checker.
-
I am applying for a PhD and use Grammarly to redact my interdisciplinary and research experience. I get a 50 - 60% probability of machine-generated text. I was just preoccupied my application will be rejected because of this.
-
I want to highlight that I am using the paid version of Grammarly. I used content at scale and every time I tried to change my sentence I appeared more robotic.
-
Hello everyone!
On numerous occasions, I have encountered a recurring issue with Turnitin's efficacy in detecting instances where students seemingly employed Generative Pre-trained Transformers, such as ANI or AGI, to generate their content. The platform fails to recognize these instances despite clear indications of potential plagiarism. It becomes evident that the sophistication of AI, especially in its generative capacities, poses a challenge to traditional plagiarism detection tools. The emergence of Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI), Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), and potential developments towards Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) underscore the need for a more robust and adaptable approach in addressing the evolving landscape of academic integrity.
-
is it possible that students are using the AI feature now available on Grammarly? see article
-
We have gone for a different take on this, having realised that our existing policy on the use of (human) proof readers wouldn't allow them to rewrite sections of a student's work, we have updated the policy to disallow using software (of any kind) to rewrite whole paragraphs. (Suggesting alternative short phrases and ways to restructure a sentence is acceptable, and there are limited exceptions for students using the software as an accommodation for a disability).
That should mean that disputes over whether something is AI generated or original work that Grammarly/Quillbot etc has improved doesn't arise, because using either to such an extent would be a breach. -
Hello All, I facing the same problem. Turnitin is claiming 46% AI use (one whole question), but he is claiming that he only used Grammarly, and he is the only one with this high of AI use. No one else in the class has used it.