4

Join the Discussion! AI in Education: Exploring Responsible Use Together (#AskTurnitin x ACUE)

Mon Mar 9 - Fri Mar 20
Event by Turnitin Official

Join Turnitin in collaboration with the Association of College and University Educators (ACUE) for an #AskTurnitin event on “AI in Education: Exploring Responsible Use Together.”

This 2-week asynchronous Q&A on the Turnitin Educator Network (TEN) begins on March 9, 2026, kicking off with a 1-hour live Q&A where pedagogical experts address pressing questions about AI in teaching and learning.

Our educators will continue answering questions asynchronously for two weeks, giving educators around the world the opportunity to engage on their own schedule.

Whether you’re concerned about student authorship, unsure how to interpret AI-detection results, or seeking ways to balance innovation with integrity, this Q&A provides practical guidance you can apply in your classroom and across your institution.

Meet our pedagogical experts:

  • Patti West-Smith  – Senior Director of Customer Engagement at Turnitin
  • Stephanie Speicher, PhD. – Academic Director at ACUE, Digital Fluency Faculty in Residence at Weber State University

How it works:

#AskTurnitin will be open for 2 weeks, giving you plenty of time to post your questions and join the discussion. Our educators will be checking in regularly to respond and share their insights.

Ask about:

  • Practical strategies for responsible AI use in teaching
  • Identifying when AI tools enhance learning versus when they create risks
  • Success stories or challenges from educators using AI tools
  • What support or resources would help in your context

#AskTurnitin Guidelines:

  1. Be respectful: Treat all participants with kindness and professionalism.
  2. Stay on topic: Focus on AI, teaching practices, and classroom experiences.
  3. No product support requests: Direct technical or account issues to Turnitin Support.
  4. Protect privacy: Do not share personally identifiable information.
  5. Engage constructively: Ask thoughtful questions and build on shared insights.

Helpful resources to support your participation:

Start the conversation:

Reply to this post with your questions and join educators around the world in exploring responsible AI use together. We look forward to learning with you. 

46 replies

    • Online Community Manager
    • kat_turnitin
    • 2 wk ago
    • Reported - view

    We received another question from TEN member   who asks:

    “I teach technical and business communication at the University of Texas at Dallas, and I'm eager to hear ideas on keeping students' attention on original work. Thanks in advance!”

     and educators who are reading this – do you have any resources or insights you could share with Jaitch4? 

      • Online Community Manager
      • kat_turnitin
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

      Here's   take on keeping students engaged in producing original work: 

      • To address this for a Technical and Business Communication context, we can move the focus from "policing" or a “got ya” mentality to professional competency and workforce readiness. From my experience, in these fields, original work isn't just about writing from scratch; it's about the student’s ability to apply professional judgment and contextual knowledge that AI doesn’t have. Below are a few specific examples: 

      • Have students use AI as a drafting partner, and require them to show their work in the revision process. They have to fact-check and context-check the output. I also have them submit a reflection or a transparency report explaining why they chose to keep, delete, or rewrite specific AI-generated sections. My aim in doing this that it develops analytical skills and makes sure the their voice is present and primary in the final draft/assignment.

      • As a teacher educator, I often frame original work as a skill for their future careers. Regardless of the discipline, as a professional, you are responsible for the accuracy of your output. So, for certain assignments, I create a rubric that stresses the importance of workforce readiness skills and their use of AI tools (knowing the why and how!). Because they ultimately need to build their efficacy and confidence in managing their AI use and the context behind their choices. 

      • We offer a wide range of resources on AI and academic integrity in ACUE Commons, our faculty community dedicated to teaching excellence. These include practical guides on using AI to support assignment design, map learning outcomes, and fact-check student work. If you're interested in exploring academic integrity in the age of AI in greater depth, stay tuned for a new series of Quick Studies, developed in partnership with Turnitin and launching in ACUE Commons this summer! Learn more: https://acue.org/offerings/acue-commons/

    • Online Community Manager
    • kat_turnitin
    • 2 wk ago
    • Reported - view

    Wanted to give a quick shoutout to this month's Top Turnitin Clarity Explorers! 🏆 
     

    We’ve noticed you’ve been exploring tons of Turnitin Clarity–tagged resources here on TEN, and it’s clear your curiosity is earning you that Turnitin Clarity Explorer badge!  We’d love to hear how you’re navigating AI in your classroom.

    There’s no right or wrong answer. AI is such a hot-button topic, and we want everyone to feel they’re not alone and that we can all learn from each other 💙 

      • Senior Teaching & Learning Innovations Specialist
      • Karen_Turnitin
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

      I'm excited to hear some answers about this topic! Educators lead the way :)

    • educator | leader | consultant
    • Julie_Brand.1
    • 2 wk ago
    • Reported - view

    In my previous role as an educator, technology was always evolving, and the rapid rise of GenAI has introduced a whole new layer to the conversation.

    Now that I speak with instructors regularly for Turnitin, I often hear concerns about balancing AI tools with meaningful student learning.

    How are you thinking about the role AI should play in supporting learning rather than replacing it?

      • Manager, Educator Engagement
      • Audrey_turnitin
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

       

      As a former educator myself, I completely relate to this. Every few years, it felt like a new technology arrived that promised to “change everything,” and GenAI has definitely accelerated that conversation.

      What I hear from my friends now who are still instructors is less about whether AI will be used and more about how we guide students to use it well. One approach that’s been helpful is shifting the conversation from AI as an answer-generator to AI as a thinking partner. For example, encouraging students to use AI for brainstorming ideas, asking clarifying questions about a concept, or getting feedback on early drafts, while still requiring them to make the key decisions, interpretations, and revisions themselves.

      In other words, the learning still lives in the student’s thinking process. AI can support that process, but it shouldn’t replace it.

      I’m curious how others are approaching this in their courses. Are you setting specific guidelines for when and how students can use AI?  or : what do you two think? 

      • Academic Director
      • Stephanie_Speicher
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

         Setting specific guidelines is so important...as we all need guardrails. In my own work with teacher‑education students, I’ve found that setting AI guidelines is most powerful when it becomes a shared, reflective process rather than a list of prohibitions. I come in with a few non‑negotiables…such as the expectation that AI can support thinking but cannot replace the student’s intellectual work; however, the rest of our norms are co‑constructed as a class. That collaborative conversation is a teachable moment in itself: students articulate their values, debate what responsible use looks like, and begin to see how they might facilitate similar discussions with their future learners. I’m intentional about framing our guidelines around what we want to see, ie, curiosity, transparency, critical thinking, vs. centering the “don’ts,” because that shift helps students view AI as a tool for learning rather than a trap to avoid. In many ways, the process models the pedagogical stance I hope they’ll carry into their own classrooms. A win-win! 😀

    • Online Community Manager
    • kat_turnitin
    • 2 wk ago
    • Reported - view

    A while back, TEN member  raised an important question that we’d love to bring back into the conversation:

    Hi all, I'd like to hear how your HE institution treats self-plagiarism (or double submission) at PG level.

    In some subjects, we may scaffold our assessments (e.g., where a proposal leads into a project) and therefore, students may be required to repeat some information across assessments (e.g., company information). For this reason, we tend to be reasonable when interpreting our TII reports. However, there are some cases where students may use recommendations from one assessment (e.g., strategic HRM) in another relevant subject (e.g., L&D) because one subject builds upon the other. It's these particular cases that I'm curious to explore best practice further.

    I've read the TII white paper (Is Recycling Your Own Work Plagiarism?), but this refers to academic self-plagiarism (i.e., breaching copyright laws or ethical misconduct), rather than student submissions, which are not in the public domain. Others’ thoughts?

    Educators in our community, we’d love to hear your thoughts on this! 

      • Online Community Manager
      • kat_turnitin
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

      shared this helpful take on the question. This might be helpful for you,  !

      • Building student efficacy and confidence through relationships, deliberate choices, and authentic assessment design. 

      • Advocate for transparency and incorporate an academic integrity statement on the first day.

      • Productive Learning Environment provides psychological safety and trust that gives students space to make mistakes.

      • Continue to be student-centered and hold students to compassionate accountability: have a conversation with your students and support students with varied learning approaches and working styles.

      • Importantly, some students may never have heard of self-plagiarism. This is why transparency on the syllabus and start-of-semester conversations are so important.

    • Online Community Manager
    • kat_turnitin
    • 13 days ago
    • Reported - view

    Hi all! We recently ran a poll on LinkedIn and TEN asking about your biggest concerns around AI in the classroom. The majority of you pointed to student authorship and originality as your top concerns.

    Since these topics have also come up in our AI Writing Q&A categoryGeneral Q & A, and Turnitin Clarity category, we’d like to invite       to join the conversation.

    We’d love to hear from you: How have recent developments in AI affected the way you approach student authorship and originality in your classroom?

    Sharing your experiences could really help other educators facing the same challenges 🤝 

    • Online Community Manager
    • kat_turnitin
    • 13 days ago
    • Reported - view

    #AskTurnitin Conversation Starters

    As AI tools become more common in education, many educators are reflecting on whether—and how—this is influencing the way they design assignments and assessments. Some are making small adjustments, while others are rethinking aspects of their course design. We’re curious to hear how this is showing up in your teaching.

    Question: Has AI influenced how you design assignments or assessments?

    Answer the poll to respond anonymously, but we also invite you to participate in the discussion by replying below.

    • Former Educator and Current Senior Customer Success Manager
    • Jo_Lewis
    • 12 days ago
    • Reported - view

    As a former teacher, one thing I’ve been thinking about lately is how AI has shifted the balance between process and product in student writing.

    In my classroom, I used to focus mostly on the final submission, but now as someone who works for Turnitin, I’m wondering if we should be evaluating more of the thinking and drafting along the way.

    How are you assessing student writing in the age of AI and what shifts in focus are you seeing as AI use permeates education more deeply? Are there activities or checkpoints that you have used or know worked well for other educators?

      • Senior Teaching & Learning Innovations Specialist
      • Karen_Turnitin
      • 12 days ago
      • Reported - view

       I was a product person all the way when I first started teaching as that is how I was taught, but 2 years in, I saw that this wasn't cutting it for the students and I worked around to including the process. I did see gains in students' work for sure!

      One of my former supervisors spent a lot of time working with teachers about whether they were assigning writing or teaching how to write ... it has left an indelible mark on my teaching and in the resources I create for Turnitin educators!

    • Online Community Manager
    • kat_turnitin
    • 11 days ago
    • Reported - view

    #AskTurnitin Conversation Starter

    Many educators are thinking about how and where to communicate expectations about AI use in their courses. Some include guidance in formal course documents, while others address it through conversations or assignment instructions. We’d love to learn how educators are approaching this in their own teaching contexts.

    Question: Where do you include guidance about AI use? (Select all that apply.)

    Answer the poll to respond anonymously, but we also invite you to participate in the discussion by replying below.

    • Online Community Manager
    • kat_turnitin
    • 10 days ago
    • Reported - view

    We recently received a question from Joel West on LinkedIn that really echoes many of the sentiments educators express, so we’re bringing it into this thread to continue the conversation.

     or , do you have any perspectives to share?

    Joel West writes on LinkedIn:

    I've developed a framework for building more AI-resilient writing assignments, and I've created a whole professional development session on just that.

    However, I am still quite concerned with student authorship and originality. The current service we use in the LMS at my institution only checks for plagiarism, which seems like a secondary concern at this point, since most students are no longer just copy-pasting from Google but having the documents completed for them entirely.

    If students are using Claude, it can completely author the assignment and format the document for them. All the student has to do is change their name and the professor's name. Citations are correct; everything appears suspicious at this point. When I see a paper with mistakes in it, I actually get excited now; however, we all know that students can just ask AI to make mistakes for them.

    These are such challenging times. I want to help students become more AI-resilient, and I am not opposed to AI overall. I'm just opposed to completely offloading thinking. Knowing what the student actually authored and what was authored by a tool would be extremely useful.

      • Academic Director
      • Stephanie_Speicher
      • 9 days ago
      • Reported - view

      Joel, 

      I really appreciate the way you’ve articulated this! These tensions are exactly what so many of us are wrestling with right now. I’m right there with you-I cheer for mistakes! :) And, I know that students can manufacter these mistakes too! I am seeking out the real HUMAN and a sense of authenticity!  Over the past several semesters, I’ve built out a variety of authentic assessments that are AI‑resilient assignments, and even with that in place, authorship and genuine student thinking often are a challenge for many students.

      The shift from copy‑paste plagiarism to full‑document outsourcing has completely changed how students engage in their learning (and not for the better).  These are challenging times for us as educators, but I share your hope. I’m not anti‑AI either; I just want students to stay intellectually present and not hand over the entire cognitive load. I stress this to my students and try to model through my own use of AI and the learning experiences we engage in. 

      Thanks for putting words to what so many of us are navigating.

      • Patti_WestSmith
      • 9 days ago
      • Reported - view

       First, let me say that I love the concept of students themselves being AI-resilient. A lot of talk has been around AI-resilience of assignments or assessments, which IS important, but refocusing that concept on STUDENTS or any users of AI is very interesting.

      It suggests that students/users can themselves learn to cope with the impacts of AI, and I think that could be a whole discussion in itself! In fact, that implication that students need resilience in the face of AI lines up nicely to some data we've seen that students themselves have fears around the impact of AI on their own learning and on society in general. In 2025, we worked with partners to survey students, educators, and administrators about AI, and 64% of students reported that they are worried about the use of AI in education. Surprisingly, that was higher than either the educator group or the administrator group. 

      While I agree with both Joel and  that there is so much positive opportunity around using AI, we have to acknowledge that students' fears are legitimate. If misused, AI could do harm. If all the thinking is outsourced to AI, it will harm the learning of students. If AI is used without any validation of its impact, there is valid concern around hallucinations, incorrect information, imprecise understandings, and biases built into the tech. Those are all legitimate things to be concerned about. That's why I think it's so important that educators step into the gap and create opportunities for students to learn how to use AI effectively and ethically. The data suggests that students are hungry for educators to help them figure this out! Knowing whether students used AI or not is important, but knowing HOW they used it is potentially more important. 

      No matter how much some might feel nostalgic about the days before AI hit the scene - and I understand the temptation there; it felt easier - those days are in the past. Does that mean that we simply give up and let AI run wild and free, let students use it however they like? No, of course not. It does, though, mean that we understand that now is the time for educators and educational technology to help provide the guardrails around how to use it responsibly, how to mitigate the harms that could happen if students don't learn how to use it effectively and ethically. Both educators and students need a safe space to do that work. 

    • Senior Teaching & Learning Innovations Specialist
    • Karen_Turnitin
    • 6 days ago
    • Reported - view

    Hi everyone!  

    I have to say that I've really enjoyed the questions and responses from everyone involved in this discussion. Some of you have reinforced ideas that I've been considering, while others have given me new perspectives that I've been mulling over. 

    If you don't already know, you'll see me introducing resources on a regular basis. I'm also available to answer any questions you have that you think I may be able to give some guidance or perspective. Just tag me in! 

    • Academic Director
    • Stephanie_Speicher
    • 6 days ago
    • Reported - view

    Hi everyone!

    It has been my honor and pleasure to be part of this conversation! It is reassuring to know that educators from a variety of spaces and places are grappling with the why and how to infuse AI into their teaching practices. Please continue to reach out with questions that push us all to think creatively and proactively for our students (and ourselves)! 

    • Online Community Manager
    • kat_turnitin
    • 6 days ago
    • Reported - view

    Thank you to everyone who participated in AI in Education: Exploring Responsible Use Together (#AskTurnitin x ACUE)

    We hope that those who joined found the conversations engaging and helpful as you navigate responsible AI use. If you missed this one, no worries, we’ll have more like this coming up soon. Stay tuned! 💙 

    • Patti_WestSmith
    • 6 days ago
    • Reported - view

    So long, farewell... I do love a good musical! I want to thank everyone who contributed to this event over the last two weeks. We know how busy you all are so whether you came and asked a question, jumped in with an idea, or just hit the like button when something resonated, we're grateful. 

    This event is over now, but remember the community is never closed so jump in, engage with each other (and us), or just keep grabbing resources that work for you! We're grateful to engage with you in any way that works for you. That's the best part of a community like TEN! 

Content aside

Attendees

Stats

  • 46Replies closed
  • 336Views