Join the Discussion! AI in Education: Exploring Responsible Use Together (#AskTurnitin x ACUE)
Join Turnitin in collaboration with the Association of College and University Educators (ACUE) for an #AskTurnitin event on “AI in Education: Exploring Responsible Use Together.”
This 2-week asynchronous Q&A on the Turnitin Educator Network (TEN) begins on March 9, 2026, kicking off with a 1-hour live Q&A where pedagogical experts address pressing questions about AI in teaching and learning.
Our educators will continue answering questions asynchronously for two weeks, giving educators around the world the opportunity to engage on their own schedule.
Whether you’re concerned about student authorship, unsure how to interpret AI-detection results, or seeking ways to balance innovation with integrity, this Q&A provides practical guidance you can apply in your classroom and across your institution.
Meet our pedagogical experts:
- Patti West-Smith – Senior Director of Customer Engagement at Turnitin
- Stephanie Speicher, PhD. – Academic Director at ACUE, Digital Fluency Faculty in Residence at Weber State University
How it works:
#AskTurnitin will be open for 2 weeks, giving you plenty of time to post your questions and join the discussion. Our educators will be checking in regularly to respond and share their insights.
Ask about:
- Practical strategies for responsible AI use in teaching
- Identifying when AI tools enhance learning versus when they create risks
- Success stories or challenges from educators using AI tools
- What support or resources would help in your context
#AskTurnitin Guidelines:
- Be respectful: Treat all participants with kindness and professionalism.
- Stay on topic: Focus on AI, teaching practices, and classroom experiences.
- No product support requests: Direct technical or account issues to Turnitin Support.
- Protect privacy: Do not share personally identifiable information.
- Engage constructively: Ask thoughtful questions and build on shared insights.
Helpful resources to support your participation:
- Turnitin Clarity: An annotated hotlist for educators
- Strengthening the reading-writing connection with AI
- Guide for approaching AI-generated text
- Responsible AI use checklist [Students’ Guide]
- Getting started with AI writing at Turnitin [Instructors Guide] [Administrators Guide]
- Diving deeper with AI writing at Turnitin [Instructors Guide] [Administrators Guide]
Start the conversation:
Reply to this post with your questions and join educators around the world in exploring responsible AI use together. We look forward to learning with you.
46 replies
-
We received another question from TEN member who asks:
“I teach technical and business communication at the University of Texas at Dallas, and I'm eager to hear ideas on keeping students' attention on original work. Thanks in advance!”
and educators who are reading this – do you have any resources or insights you could share with Jaitch4?
-
Wanted to give a quick shoutout to this month's Top Turnitin Clarity Explorers!
We’ve noticed you’ve been exploring tons of Turnitin Clarity–tagged resources here on TEN, and it’s clear your curiosity is earning you that Turnitin Clarity Explorer badge! We’d love to hear how you’re navigating AI in your classroom.
There’s no right or wrong answer. AI is such a hot-button topic, and we want everyone to feel they’re not alone and that we can all learn from each other
-
In my previous role as an educator, technology was always evolving, and the rapid rise of GenAI has introduced a whole new layer to the conversation.
Now that I speak with instructors regularly for Turnitin, I often hear concerns about balancing AI tools with meaningful student learning.How are you thinking about the role AI should play in supporting learning rather than replacing it?
-
A while back, TEN member raised an important question that we’d love to bring back into the conversation:
Hi all, I'd like to hear how your HE institution treats self-plagiarism (or double submission) at PG level.
In some subjects, we may scaffold our assessments (e.g., where a proposal leads into a project) and therefore, students may be required to repeat some information across assessments (e.g., company information). For this reason, we tend to be reasonable when interpreting our TII reports. However, there are some cases where students may use recommendations from one assessment (e.g., strategic HRM) in another relevant subject (e.g., L&D) because one subject builds upon the other. It's these particular cases that I'm curious to explore best practice further.
I've read the TII white paper (Is Recycling Your Own Work Plagiarism?), but this refers to academic self-plagiarism (i.e., breaching copyright laws or ethical misconduct), rather than student submissions, which are not in the public domain. Others’ thoughts?
Educators in our community, we’d love to hear your thoughts on this!
-
Hi all! We recently ran a poll on LinkedIn and TEN asking about your biggest concerns around AI in the classroom. The majority of you pointed to student authorship and originality as your top concerns.
Since these topics have also come up in our AI Writing Q&A category, General Q & A, and Turnitin Clarity category, we’d like to invite to join the conversation.
We’d love to hear from you: How have recent developments in AI affected the way you approach student authorship and originality in your classroom?
Sharing your experiences could really help other educators facing the same challenges
-
#AskTurnitin Conversation Starters
As AI tools become more common in education, many educators are reflecting on whether—and how—this is influencing the way they design assignments and assessments. Some are making small adjustments, while others are rethinking aspects of their course design. We’re curious to hear how this is showing up in your teaching.
Question: Has AI influenced how you design assignments or assessments?
Answer the poll to respond anonymously, but we also invite you to participate in the discussion by replying below.
-
As a former teacher, one thing I’ve been thinking about lately is how AI has shifted the balance between process and product in student writing.
In my classroom, I used to focus mostly on the final submission, but now as someone who works for Turnitin, I’m wondering if we should be evaluating more of the thinking and drafting along the way.
How are you assessing student writing in the age of AI and what shifts in focus are you seeing as AI use permeates education more deeply? Are there activities or checkpoints that you have used or know worked well for other educators? -
#AskTurnitin Conversation Starter
Many educators are thinking about how and where to communicate expectations about AI use in their courses. Some include guidance in formal course documents, while others address it through conversations or assignment instructions. We’d love to learn how educators are approaching this in their own teaching contexts.
Question: Where do you include guidance about AI use? (Select all that apply.)
On your syllabus In assignment guidelines During in-class conversations I don’t include guidance about AI use yet OtherAnswer the poll to respond anonymously, but we also invite you to participate in the discussion by replying below.
-
We recently received a question from Joel West on LinkedIn that really echoes many of the sentiments educators express, so we’re bringing it into this thread to continue the conversation.
or , do you have any perspectives to share?
Joel West writes on LinkedIn:
I've developed a framework for building more AI-resilient writing assignments, and I've created a whole professional development session on just that.
However, I am still quite concerned with student authorship and originality. The current service we use in the LMS at my institution only checks for plagiarism, which seems like a secondary concern at this point, since most students are no longer just copy-pasting from Google but having the documents completed for them entirely.
If students are using Claude, it can completely author the assignment and format the document for them. All the student has to do is change their name and the professor's name. Citations are correct; everything appears suspicious at this point. When I see a paper with mistakes in it, I actually get excited now; however, we all know that students can just ask AI to make mistakes for them.
These are such challenging times. I want to help students become more AI-resilient, and I am not opposed to AI overall. I'm just opposed to completely offloading thinking. Knowing what the student actually authored and what was authored by a tool would be extremely useful. -
Hi everyone!
I have to say that I've really enjoyed the questions and responses from everyone involved in this discussion. Some of you have reinforced ideas that I've been considering, while others have given me new perspectives that I've been mulling over.
If you don't already know, you'll see me introducing resources on a regular basis. I'm also available to answer any questions you have that you think I may be able to give some guidance or perspective. Just tag me in! -
Hi everyone!
It has been my honor and pleasure to be part of this conversation! It is reassuring to know that educators from a variety of spaces and places are grappling with the why and how to infuse AI into their teaching practices. Please continue to reach out with questions that push us all to think creatively and proactively for our students (and ourselves)!
-
Thank you to everyone who participated in AI in Education: Exploring Responsible Use Together (#AskTurnitin x ACUE)
We hope that those who joined found the conversations engaging and helpful as you navigate responsible AI use. If you missed this one, no worries, we’ll have more like this coming up soon. Stay tuned! -
So long, farewell... I do love a good musical! I want to thank everyone who contributed to this event over the last two weeks. We know how busy you all are so whether you came and asked a question, jumped in with an idea, or just hit the like button when something resonated, we're grateful.
This event is over now, but remember the community is never closed so jump in, engage with each other (and us), or just keep grabbing resources that work for you! We're grateful to engage with you in any way that works for you. That's the best part of a community like TEN!
